Please note that in a binant, the numbers are always reset with each sub-document. At present, it is not possible to allow a title level to continue its numbering beyond the sub-documents. You can specify either a tabstoppage stop, a space, or any sign that must follow the numbering of a title. In total, there appear to be three main types of combinations for which there is agreement. In addition to verbs and their subjects, we find certain adjective words that correspond to a name that usually follows them, but sometimes goes ahead, and pronouns that correspond to nouns or their equivalents. Each of these types has certain features that may be related to the success of reading and/or writing. The number is probably the most common cause of Pronoun agreement errors (see 28. Pronoun Errors, #5), followed by sex. The problem with this one is again common.

This combination of agreements includes only the owners of me, ours, theirs, his, theirs and yours. They always precede a noun, but not the one with which they agree: the rules of subject-verb agreement sometimes help to show whether a word in a text is a verb or not. For example, if we see the increase in prices combined, we will know by the absence of a final increase, that this must be a noun, because a verb with price as a single theme should be increases. If the increase is a Nov, the price must be a Nov, which describes it in an adjective way (see 38. Nomen Used like Addjectives) – and the verb of the phrase will be elsewhere. 7So adjective and reduplication acts as a chord of numbers. At least for verbs, such an agreement seems to be semantic; The NP, whose plurality is signalled by the repeat, can have no other indication of plurality: in terms of numbering, ClauseBase exports results fully compatible with Microsoft Word. In ClauseBase, however, the numbering approach is optimized for creating legal documents and is therefore very different from Microsoft Word.

This was a deliberate decision, not only because Microsoft Word has a much wider audience (and therefore cannot be optimized for legal documents), but also because Microsoft Word`s numbering system has become incredibly complex over the years, due to Microsoft`s attempts to conceal complexity. Although these trials are well-intentioned, they have even made the situation worse over the years. The agreement is one of those basic areas of English grammar with which many advanced learners, such as commas and capital letters, still regularly make mistakes. Part of the reason is probably that the concept of agreement actually covers a fairly wide range of different structures. As a result, different aspects are usually presented at different times, making it more difficult for learners to make useful connections between them, and there are many places where errors are likely. In the Numbering Scheme subsection, you can specify how to print the numbering for each of the 9 title levels. Numbering the article. Typically, items receive Arabic numbers with or without a full stop (1st, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3).

In American legal practice, you will also find Roman numbering (Article I, Article II). If you decide to number items in Roman numbers, you should go back to Arabic numbering to get references to the sections (i.e. section 2.3 would be the third part of Article II). Original contracts sometimes place the word item before the item number. Note that the allocation of the agreement into articles and sections is not mandatory. However, the division of the agreement into article is rare, especially when the agreement exceeds six or seven sections or when the different sections can be divided into two or three groups of a rather different nature.